Window Flashings, Cladding, and Sills

A head flashing similar to this was installed above the window in our family room by contract and design. 

I made the mistake of complaining about a dent, so 
Heaatherbrae retaliated by removing the entire head flashing and council refused to make them replace it







in spite of my requests pursuant to the terms of the building envelope contract and warranty and Morrison Hershfield's specifications for window heads to have "flashings c/w end dams (colour to match cladding)" 

and in spite of the Project Specifications
19. Material and Equipment
Page 15 of 17
.1 ...materials...shall be new, not damaged or defective, and of best quality for purpose intended...

the cement board siding over the window of Unit 409 is still damaged and gouged
with white edges showing up after less than 3 years of sun on the sealant 














The missing head flashing and unsightly damage
is located on our patio where it is noticeable to visitors
who sit there and look at it, not to mention prospective purchasers.
It's embarrassing and interferes with the enjoyment of our home, not to mention its value.  

The weep holes in the frame are filled with black mold

We never noticed our original patio windows showing this kind of staining. Even if leaks and premature failure of the sealant from sun damage do not show up for 10 years or more - from the way things were done here it looks like the building envelope may be designed to last for as short a period as possible after the 10-year warranty expires.

Not only was the contract breached to deprive us of flashings, proper labour, and undamaged materials in retaliation for complaining about a dented flashing, but we were maliciously deprived of physical health and safety by installation of hazardous exterior sealant throughout our interior (Unit 409 only target, no other units) contrary to WHMIS instructions that forced me out of my own home for more than a month and required open windows for a year to dissipate residual odour after removal and replacement.

Any expectation of the building envelope repairs meeting the minimum requirements of the current building code for windows, ventilation, or anything else, was quashed by council advising that everything was built under the old code so it didn't need to. 

Making matters worse, ground level replacement of the original sliding windows that allowed for secure ventilation and the intended use and enjoyment of our patio with a swing out style unreasonably deprived us of both. So we live vulnerable to intruders entering through open windows. It also ensured that when our shade trees were replaced with panoramic views for those above us installation of solar screens to reduce the heat would be impossible. 

The stress from decades of slings and arrows from relentless attacks is so sickening that it's unspeakable.

https://vinylwindowdesigns.com/sites/S1/File/Articles/ATT%20E%20-%20Best%20Practices.pdf

Best practices guidelines for replacing windows use strategies to "deflect and drain" water from window areas on moisture prone houses. This involves deflecting water away at the top of window openings, providing unobstructed pathways for water to drain from top of window opening down to sill, and draining water from window opening to outside at sill of window. Water deflection at the top of the window opening prevents water from above window from draining down cladding and onto window/wall joints. Solution is to install drip cap (header flashing) on wall above window opening pursuant to building code requirements. Profile to be sloped at an angle of 10 degrees or more to ensure water drains off of surface. Shaped "dams" at ends to prevent water from running over edge. Width to extend at least 1" beyond edge of new window flange. Seal exterior window/cladding joints with exterior grade caulking installed per manufacturers instructions.

So much for our exterior windows. Now to move onto the interior.

These are our original window sills















Our new windows are smaller than the originals, and the sills have boards added below to cover a 2-inch gap. Wooden strips were added to cover the gaps on the sides also, so our blinds no longer fit without being staggered. 














409's new window sill - good job boys - I hope you're proud of the quality of this replacement. Our original window sills were thick molded wood with marine enamel paint. The new window sills in Unit 409 were all left unpainted.

Making matters worse, the building envelope was sealed air tight and my requests for ventilation to match Phase 2 or the new building code were refused. So we still have leave them open to ventilate, even the year it took to vent the toxic fumes from the exterior sealant attack, and laving our windows open to the rain eventually split the wood.    

So much for windows.

In regard to siding, maybe its because I'm annoyed that I see things you might not otherwise notice.

I don't know if all these seams in the cladding on the north of 412 are normal or not, but 11 seams in 11 consecutive rows located on an entrance wall seems like a lot to me. I don't know if such a proliferation of seams was deliberate or just shoddy workmanship - since the owner, Rene Davies, also dared to challenge some of what was happening and complaining in this strata has insidious consequences.

At least they are lined up.







               






There doesn't seem to be much, if anything, that owners can do about abusive practices and shoddy industry standards except to shine a light on the facts as we know them and hope that it will somehow help if others know also.

Ventilation

Project SpecificationsInstructions to Bidders Section 00100, Part 1 - Preface 1.2 Project Description, Page 2 of 10 .2
Design Intent Statements states:
.1 The installation of the exterior sheathing membrane is intended to improve the air tightness of the building envelope.

We are unable to use our shower due to mould that we can't get rid of.
We replaced the tiles, grout, and sealant but it just came right back.


















BC's Housing and Construction Standards states:

While ventilation strategies can have a significant impact on energy performance, ventilation is primarily a health and safety issue. Inadequate ventilation can lead to mould, a high concentrations of CO2, and other indoor air pollutants, which can lead to adverse health outcomes.

http://www.housing.gov.bc.ca/building/green/energy/index.htm

With respect to Sunridge Estates, at least half of the 2-bedroom units have a natural cross draft when all the doors are opened. None of the 3-bedroom units do. Our unit, number 409 is a 3-bedroom unit.

I did my best to solve ventilation problems - most of which I thought would be a concern in not just our unit, but in other units also - and was subjected to astonishing oppression and abuse as a result.

Owners, and even some council members, were kept in the dark - critical decisions were made and not recorded in the minutes. One or more members of Council sabataged, ignored, or denied my requests for various upgrades during the building envelope project which we were prepared to pay for. Instead, the complex was seriously downgraded and about half a million dollars of special levy funds were diverted to demolish and reconstruct extra decks and destroy the landscaping to create unobstructed panoramic views, to the detriment of others, and particularly Unit 409.

I must have been niave, but I thought the building envelope project might be an opportunity for a practical remedy for a variety of concerns, which I reported, but council never investigated or responded to. I was silenced with threats of police action for criminal harassment when I reported ventilation issues, including:

Bedroom - I advised of heavy black mold in the windows and requested a ventilation upgrade;
Bathroom - I advised of black mildew in the ensuite and a substandard bathroom vent with a reduced opening and requested a larger vent;
Windows - I requested an upgrade to insulated safety glass to help resolve heat and security issues;
Fireplace - I requested an upgrade to fresh air ventilation to our fireplace and advised that we could not burn it without smoke entering the room.

An unidentified person decided against all of the above upgrades without giving owners or council a chance to have a vote and without publishing the decisions in the minutes as required by law. I was able to get fresh air ventilation for the bedroom in Unit 409 only, but nothing else. An unidentified person charged me $500 for a $20 vent, which was so scandalous that another unidentified person refunded the money to me. Contrary to the law, the minutes do not record such harmful shenanigans.

Mold still prevents us from using the shower in our ensuite, the air still doesn't move in our fans, our vents are still blocked by construction defects, smoke still prevents us from using our fireplace, heat from the summer sun is still a problem, and fear still disturbs me when I am home alone.

Details

March 18, 2003
I reported heavy black mold that I scraped from our bedroom windows and asked council to provide a ventilation report to owners from the building envelope professionals to include a price estimate and method of upgrading it.

The strata corporation asked me to provide some research for council's consideration.

April 14, 2003
I received an email from Al MacLeod with respect to reports I submitted on awnings and landscaping saying, "Dianne, since the beginning of this process you have demonstrated a sense of purpose in acquiring information and your willingness to share it with council is quite impressive. As an owner here, it is much appreciated"

April 19, 2003
I delivered my ventilation and mold report to council to the strata mailbox and requested added ventilation to meet the current building code and ventilation performance requirements of the Canadian Standards Association.

The Bathtub Guys looked at the ensuite in Unit 409 and told us they had never seen mold go up so high on the wall before. They advised that the developer had not installed the tub correctly, which is why installing cement board and new tiles would never stop the mold. The developer also installed the ensuite fan incorrectly. An improper overlap reduced the size of the vent's opening. They refused the job on the basis that having seen the conditions they would not be able to guarantee their work.

August 15, 2003
I attended a council meeting and presented in writing 12 proposed motions, which council voted to attach to the minutes. Instead, 12 different items drafted by Mr. Mac were attached to the minutes, as if I were the source. On August 28, 2008, I delivered to the owners an addendum with my 12 proposals, which included motions for consulting an arborist and/or landscape architect, and for the building envelope professionals to make recommendations on fresh-air ventilation and other concerns

September 12, 2003
I was informed that my April 19, 2003, ventilation report was not distributed to the members of council and that council would like to receive a copy, so I emailed a copy of what I had delivered. Mr. Mac hit the reply button claiming that he had been advised by legal council to call the police to press criminal harassment charges if I sent anymore email to members of council. I was shocked. Although I could not imagine any lawyer who would give such advice, Mr. Mac's accusations upset me so badly that my nightly sleep became seriously disturbed

September 18, 2003

Richard F. Taylor from Morrison Hershfield wrote in response to sketches of architectural design proposals I submitted and said that adding awnings could be an option that reduces the vulnerable elements of the building and in their opinion my comment regarding making the rooflines simpler, rather than restoring the original design, would potentially result in lower costs. The left side of this drawings shows changes I suggested.













March 3, 2005
I emailed the strata corporation my doctor's advice that I was suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and that I require clean air for my lungs and asked for authorization for ventilation to be added to Unit 409.

A fresh air vent was eventually installed in our bedroom, but not until BC Homeowner Protection Office intervened on my behalf. I attached a hepa filter to it that runs automatically, and the improvement it makes in the air quality is so noticable that I feel thankful for it every day.



















This vent is one BIG reason why we don't want to move. Since it was installed we have much less black mould.

****

We got the vent in Unit 409 - but it sure wasn't easy.

April 1, 2005
The strata corporation told me that I had to pay a non-refundable $500.00 up front prior to council having Heatherbrae and Morrison Hershfield investigate and provide pricing and a change order.

April 28, 2003
I provided the requested cheque payable to the strata corporation in the amount of $500 and requested that 2 vents be placed in the most suitable locations, one to bring in fresh air and the other for an exhaust to vent interior air outside.

I stated that I would install my own equipment after Heatherbrae placed the vents in the building envelope.

May 8, 2005
I emailed the project manager confirming that I was in agreement with having Heatherbrae's sub-contractor take care of providing and installing suitable vents.

May 18, 2005
The project manager emailed me to advise that Morrison Hershfield would not do anything until I provided Engineered Shop-Drawings from a registered and certified Mechanical Engineer for approval.

All of the units in Phase 2 were constructed with these vents included in the downstairs bedrooms. It was therefore quite surprising that similar vents were not to be added to Phase 1, and that installing such a vent in our upstairs bedroom would require Engineered Shop-Drawings.

May 27, 2005
I jumped through all kinds of hoops trying to figure out the ventilation until the Home Owner Protection office confirmed that it was not possible to obtain Engineered Shop-Drawings from a registered and certified Mechanical Engineer because the vents to be installed were not a mechanical device. They advised me that the strata corporation's building envelope engineers/consultants should be the ones to make recommendations as to what needs to be done to address my ventilation issue to prevent another envelope failure and comply with the warranty coverage.

June 16, 2005
Heatherbrae cut a round hole under the window in the master bedroom of unit 409. Several weeks later a round vent like the ones the hardware store sells for $15 was stuck through the hole.

 I would like those responsible to compensate me for motel bills

 and personal injury from toxic sealant formulated for outdoor use being applied inside 409 by Heatherbrae in copious quantities

 

knowing I had lung disease

1. 

The strata eventually installed the vent, replaced the toxic sealant, and returned our $500 cheque, but continued to retaliate by removing surrounding trees and threatening us with lawyers in attempts to intimidate me into removing these blogs, the accuracy of which has never been disputed. Our requests for reinstatement of the original windows and doors and trees, structural repairs, and correction of faulty installations of the bathtub and ensuite exhaust fan in our unit are continually ignored or denied without owner votes.

December 16, 2013
For whatever its worth, I filled out a survey for the Province of BC Building and Safety Standards Branch public review on new, proposed ventilation requirements to come into effect December 19, 2014. http://fluidsurveys.com/surveys/bssb/9-32/?TEST_DATA=

Below are some excerpts from a free ASHRAE guide for professionals
to acceptable indoor air quality in buildings

1. Manage the Design and Construction Process to Achieve Good IAQ;

2. Control Moisture in Building Assemblies;

3. Limit Entry of Outdoor Contaminants;

4. Control Moisture and Contaminants Related to Mechanical Systems;

5. Limit Contaminants from Indoor Sources;

6. Capture and Exhaust Contaminants from Building Equipment and Activities;

7.ReduceContaminantConcentrationsthroughVentilation, Filtration, and Air Cleaning; and

8. Apply More Advanced Ventilation Approaches.

The summary guidance is available as a pdf file for free download at www.ashrae. org/iaq. The detailed design and construction guidance is sold on CD. Hopefully it will contribute to improved IAQ for many years into the future, beginning by having a major impact on today’s efforts to promote sustainable buildings.

References

1. EPA and NIOSH. 1991. Introduction to Indoor Air Quality. A Reference Manual. EPA/400/3-91/003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Public Health Service, National Environmental Health Association.

2. SMACNA. 2007. ANSI/SMACNA 008-2008, IAQ Guidelines for Occupied Buildings Under Construction. Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors’ National Association.

Andrew Persily, Ph.D., is group leader, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md. Martha Hewett is director of research, Center for Energy and Environment, Minneapolis.

Project Overview

The building envelope repair project for Sunridge Estates started in 2002 and was substantially complete in 2005. The first special levy was approved in August 2004, and, including legal fees, nearly 6 million dollars was paid into the project, with the cost to Unit 409 being almost $100,000.

In violation of express protections provided in terms of the project contract, hundreds of trees were needlessly removed  to create panoramic views, contrary to s.71 of the Strata Property Act and restrictive covenants that run with the land, destroying a valuable urban forest in blatant disregard of geotechnic, privacy, esthetic, economic, and legal concerns. Some trees were killed by exposing their roots and crushing them under deliberate storage of heavy weights during the building envelope project - but most were systematically eliminated during the next five years, transforming what had been beautiful park-like landscaping into a scandal and unrecognizable embarrassment.

With then realtor, Al Macleod, directly and indirectly at the center of strata affairs from 2003 to 2013, a few rogues formed a corrupt alliance of scofflaws. During this period it was shocking to see Mr. Macleod and Georgia Title permanently destroy millions of dollars of work by registered landscape architects to create their own preferred views, and my neighbours Sherrill Berg and Mae Reid, city politician, avoid paying user fees by diverting about half a million dollars of surplus special levy funds to build extra decks in 2007, contrary to the law and against the AGM direction of owners who paid the special levy.

The common property was left  looking like a war zone for over 5 years, from 2005 to 2010, during which time I was increasingly alarmed as a sudden rash of buildings sinking, underground pipes breaking, and pavement cracking developed as the roots of removed trees that were not reinstated or replaced decomposed. 

Owners fled in droves while Al Macleod advertised "panoramic" views and "bonus" decks for sale and avoided paying user fees for taking common property for his own exclusive use by offloading the cost of demolition, reconstruction, and maintenance of rotting illegally added extra decks onto others. Even though almost all of those selling boycotted him as a realtor, Al MacLeod still managed to profit from about half the sales by acting on behalf of buyers taking advantage of hardship sales at fire-sale prices.  

AS I COMPLAINED - THE STRATA MANAGEMENT TEAM ATTACKED

When I complained about lack of repairs and maintenance and significant changes in the use and appearance of common property after the building envelope project Mr. Macleod told me that he had a right to act against critical owners, and he and Georgia Title had beautiful sound trees that I had managed to protect and preserve around Unit 409 cut down, in full knowledge of their value and importance to me and to the geotechnical stability of the surrounding land. Our property was vandalized repeatedly, and our lives have never been the same.

I was charged $500 for a $15 air vent to accommodate COPD, and once my lungs were known to be sensitive they were subjected to a chemical assault where large gaps around replacement windows and doors THROUGHOUT the INTERIOR of our home were filled with toxic sealant formulated for EXTERIOR use. The extortion and assault were obviously criminal, and the project manager returned my cheque to me, uncashed.

It was not just that the formulation was toxic - the amount used was so excessive that the sealant hung down from the top of our windows like valences and rolled down the sides like swags. The fumes poisoned our air so much that I had to move to a motel. This was only done to us, after I told the strata management team about the vulnerability of my lungs. It was not done to any other unit, at least not to my knowledge after 10 years' of complaining about it to anyone who would listen.

The strata management team responded to our complaints by trying to destroy evidence and  threatening us with lawyers if we tried to defend against what appeared to be a targeted assault. After the strata eventually "remedied" the "mistake" by replacing the gobs of exterior formula with an interior formula applied over backer rod, with no apology or admission of responsibility. we had to keep our windows open for nearly a year, including the winter, until the residual fumes finally dissipated, and my lungs have never felt the same as they did before. 

Excerpts from the Criminal Code, C-46

“bodily harm” means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person and that is more than merely transient or trifling in nature;

“complainant” means the victim of an alleged offence;

“weapon” means any thing used in causing injury to any person, or for the purpose of threatening or intimidating any person.

21. Every one is a party to an offence who actually commits it; does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or abets any person in committing it.

180. Every one commits a common nuisance who fails to discharge a legal duty and thereby causes physical injury to any person, is guilty of an indictable offence.

219. Every one is criminally negligent who in doing anything, or in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do, shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.

221. Every one who by criminal negligence causes bodily harm to another person is guilty of an indictable offence.

245. Every one who administers or causes to be administered to any person any destructive or noxious thing is guilty of an indictable offence if he intends thereby to aggrieve or annoy that person.

***************

After the building envelope repairs were completed hundreds more trees and most of the landscaping was destroyed, patios were sabotaged, and fraudulent misrepresentations were normalized.

Owners sold as they could not afford to lose years of property value while the real estate market was skyrocketing and peace and enjoyment and money they paid in good faith was effectively stolen by the strata management team, most notably, Al MacLeod, Coquitlam City Councillor Mae Reid, and her "friend" Councillor Sherrill Berg, to name a few of the most prominent members.

 Limited common property was misrepresented, repairs and maintenance were sectioned off, downgrading and excluding strata plan patios for years while balconies were upgraded, repaired promptly, and fully maintained. Exterior water taps were not extended as specified, marine enamel was replaced with primer, design and material defects, material downgrades, and years of inexcusable delays prevailed while the strata management team ignored facts and law and warranties

Those who paid the most got less than they bargained for, while those who paid the least and took the most at the expense of others got more than they bargained for, and those who complained were viciously attacked without mercy.

Make It Right

This strata complex was vandalized during the building envelope project with damaging design defects to our addresses, taps, windows and doors, wanton destruction of trees and patios, and all kinds of downgrades, resulting in much higher expense for future maintenance. 

Strata owners should not be vilified and attacked in their own homes for trying to hold accountable those acting, if not with criminal intent, in major conflicts of interest to escape paying their fair share.

This is Al MacLeod. The strata corporation has never held him accountable for his conduct as he churned strata managers, owners, common property, and bank accounts in shocking conflicts of interest. Mr. MacLeod retaliated against challengers - claiming that he had a right to act against them - which influenced others to attack as well. 

This is Cindy Norman, Al MacLeod's girlfriend who was working in the accounting department of Teamwork Property Management when Mr. MacLeod arranged for their strata management services - in Abbotsford - for Sunridge Estates in Coquitlam.

This is Teamwork, Mr. MacLeod's long-distance property management company hand picked in the most alarming conflict of interest, fined $7,000 for professional misconduct.

http://www.stratawatch.ca/directory/411/SR-News/special-report-teamworkpm.html

Leaky condo owners should be able to trust their members of council not to tamper with strata funds, act in violation of the law and bylaws, or willfully destroy property.

Equal protection before the law should be a true Charter right - not legal fiction.  The courts should ensure that law abiding homeowners who are deprived of affordable access to justice are not bullied by those with a monopoly on the practice of law and ensure that they are able to rely on legislation, terms of contract, and Project Specifications without having to litigate in a system of discrimination against the vulnerable and deference to the elite. 

Anyone who nefariously betrays the trust of homeowners, violates bylaws, legislation, and terms of contract, or otherwise plays a role instrumental in creating foreseeable damage to others should be held accountable for the resultant damage and loss.  

With all due respect to Al MacLeod, and others acting contrary to law for their own unjust enrichment, the whole of the circumstances raise apprehensions that I was assaulted and the property was vandalized in a deliberate 5-year plan to swindle owners out of almost half a million dollars of special levy funds to entrench illegally added extra decks, avoid paying user fees, and destroy landscaping to create unobstructed panoramic views for the principal benefit of himself at the expense of the strata.

Al MacLeod was also reprimanded by the Real Estate Board for misconduct arising out of what appears to be a $10,000 embezzlement and money laundering operation that may have placed the strata corporation at risk of liability for the resultant loss to the Halfords, former owners of 518.

Professional people should not cause injury to their clients or pretend to be deaf and dumb for years - instead they should be quick to provide reasonable explanations and corrective actions -
worthy of respect. Professional reputations should be able to withstand reasonable scrutiny.

I would hope that this blog might motivate 

MORRISON HERSHFIELD

 and HEATHERBRAE CONSTRUCTION
 

to admit responsibility for causing foreseeable damage
and avoid defective designs, materials, and work in the future.


We ask Morrison Hershfield, Heatherbrae Construction, the Condo Advocate, Alan Cadwell

the Homeowner Protection Office,  this Strata Corporation and its former agent, Al MacLeod 

and lawyers, Stephen Hamilton

 and Adrienne Murray 

to stop looking for excuses to avoid responsibility for the roles they played and put their heads together to make it right.

**********

I would like the strata to reinstate the original swing-in door design and restore the complex to a standard that at least meets its original condition and function of the buildings



 so it is not vandalized the way 409 was


















negligently - or maliciously
 
 I would like Morrison Hershfield or whoever is responsible for the change to

1. reinstate the building numbers on lower units to their original proximity to the light so ambulances and visitors can see the numbers - coming from east or west - day and night
   

I would like Heatherbrae to

 extend the pipes to 409's exterior taps as required in the project specifications, and as Heatherbrae did for others

and reinstate 409's east window flashing
which Heatherbrae damaged, removed, and never replaced
and replace the east siding on 409 that Heatherbrae left damaged

 

 I would like those responsible to compensate me for motel bills

 and personal injury from toxic sealant formulated for outdoor use being applied inside 409 by Heatherbrae in copious quantities

 

knowing I had lung disease

1. 

Heatherbrae removed the old weather stripping around 409's front door and left it off for months. We wanted it replaced with new, the same as on other units.  Eventually we had to replace it ourselves.

We would like the cladding that we paid for to be put on the hydro kiosk where it belongs instead on on the ground where it is wasted

p

so that the kiosk in front of 409 matches the building again, the way it did originally

 The stucco on it no longer matches - and was left is shocking condition - for years 

We would like 405 fixed so the front wall dries without leaving a wet spot after it rains 

We would like the front staircases in Phase 2 replaced with cement 
because for YEARS the strata management team failed to maintain the paint

   
We would like the strata management team to restore the common property and buildings to good condition and reinstate the trees.

For approximately 6 million dollars we would like owners to get fair value from the engineers, architects, contractors, lawyers, and others involved in this project 

http://www.straight.com/news/354256/do-rain-screen-requirements-bc-bube ildings-make-sense

Uwe Naumann, a former BCIT building-envelope-technology instructor, is a German-trained engineer with suspicions that the rain-screen requirement for residential buildings adopted as part of the 2006 provincial building code benefits mostly engineering and construction companies, not homeowners, and is the “biggest fraudulent thing going on in British Columbia.”

There’s also no substitute for good, old-fashioned design sense. “I always say the old architects, they knew it was raining in Vancouver,” he said. “The new architects, they don’t seem to think that it’s raining in Vancouver.”  I say, the architects ARE NOT STUPID, there is method to their madness. They know how to pull the strings to PROFIT FROM THEIR OWN WRONGS.

According to Naumann, stopping water penetration is as easy as putting the right flashing or weatherproofing material on windows, doors, vents, and other openings. 

“And if people do it that way right, I tell them the building is good for as long as a whole building lasts.” 

All that is true - it’s common sense. But who can the homeowner trust? We KNOW what happens when the job is NOT done right.

  

If you want the job done right the safest way is to DO IT YOURSELF if you are competent to do so. 

The problem is that most home owners are not competent builders, and construction companies ARE NOT STUPID - they know “doing it right” spoils their opportunities to PROFIT FROM THEIR OWN WRONGS.

When we complained about defects to Heatherbrae Construction they retaliated

 They took off the head, and left it off with 409's siding all gouged

Heatherbrae left the matching foot on, with progressively growing black at the bottom of 409's window. We don't know if it is mould, or rot, or Heatherbrae's idea of a logo

The principle of 90% planning and 10% implementation is no secret. The secret lies in WHO is doing the planning, and WHO is doing the implementation, and - in the case of unjust enrichment - WHY.  

The truth must be exposed, and penalties must be much swifter and harsher than they are  to motivate these jerks to DO IT RIGHT. Effective solutions are obvious for not just construction failures, but for corruption in governance.

So let’s say that, although architects are not stupid, politicians ARE. To put it kindly. Having said that, politicians, just like architects and construction companies, are expert in putting their own interest above the public interest. Historical patterns shows that too many politicians operate on the principle of “look good” at the expense of society.

I really believe that legislation should stop pretending that corporations are people and start making politicians and professionals accountable and liable with imprisonment and compensatory damages, instead of promoting further profit from their previous misconduct at the expense of the innocent. These pillars of power and privilege should spend a couple of hours in the local community, immobilized in stocks, with a photo and report in the sport pages. I think the prison population would be the opposite of what it is today if levels of responsibility corresponded to levels or power, remuneration, and damage, and the well-being of society would sky rocket along with the Earth’s.

In October 2008, three years after the October 2005 completion of leaky condo repairs 

this is just one of the problems owners had to deal with:

If any building envelope professionals or strata agents
have reason to be less than proud of their role in this project
please change your conduct.

MAKE IT RIGHT

***********************************************